News

Who says Aussie is better for tax!

The Australian budget set tax rates for the next two years so how do we compare.  The following table sets out tax payable using the basic scales so Working for Families, Medicare etc are not included.  Note how Australia “whacks” non-Australian tax resident (“NR”) earners who pop over for a few months!

Income NZ Tax Oz Tax OZ NR tax
$37,000 5,459 3,388 12,025
$48,000 7,420 6,963 15,600
$70,000 14,020 13,138 22,750
$80,000 17,320 17,213 26,000
$100,000 23,920 26,213 33,400
$120,000 30,520 35,213 40,800
$140,000 37,120 44,213 48,200
$160,000 43,720 53,213 55,600

So, at a basic tax rate level, above $80,000 New Zealand has lower rates and don’t pay Medicare, capital gains tax or stamp duty – food for thought!!!

 

Hanover Finance Investors may be able to claim tax losses

Investors affected by the Hanover Finance – Allied Farmers debt-for-equity swap may now be able to treat any loss on share sales as ax deductible.
Investors who were owed money by Hanover can now ask us to assess their Proposed deduction for the loss.


90 Day Trial Period Changes

The 90 Day Trial Period is not offering employers the protection most people expect. Recent court decisions now obligate employers to ensure their recruitment processes enable them to prove they have acted fairly in their recruitment processes. Employers are coming to grief by holding 90 Day Trial Periods and invoking the dismissal clauses only to find they were not entitled to hold a 90 Day Trial Period at all. The Employment Court decisions on two cases are significant.

Employers’ pre-employment systems (including letters of offer) should contemplate:

  1. Advise candidates a 90 Day Trial Period is in the intended agreement and while the employer wishes to include it in the terms and conditions it needs to be negotiated and agreed upon by both parties.
  2. Ascertain when the 90 Day Trial Period is to start and end.
  3. Any offer of employment should be subject to the terms and conditions of the intended Individual Employment Agreement being agreed to and signed off.
  4. A copy of the intended employment agreement must be given to the candidate and employers should advise them in writing that:
  5. a) They may seek independent advice about the intended agreement;
    b) They are entitled to bargain;
    c) And they may arrange for someone to bargain on their behalf.

  6. Candidates must be given time to:
  7. a) Familiarise themselves with the intended employment agreement;
    b) Ask any questions;
    c) Arrange someone to advise them or appoint someone to bargain for them.

  8. Be aware that the moment a job is offered and accepted (verbally is enough), the candidate immediately becomes an employee and the employer cannot hold a 90 Day Trial Period if it has not already been discussed, arranged and included in the intended employment agreement before the time of acceptance.

We would also advise the following:

  • If employers wish to hold a 90 Day Trial Period employers must get their pre-employment process right and to be certain it complies with the legal process.
  • The pre=employment process should offer the candidate the above advice
  • Employers must not offer the position to candidates before obtaining a completed employment agreement.
  • If the need to dismiss arises, employers are advised to follow the normal dismissal procedures as if there was no 90 Day Trial Period in place or they expose themselves to significant risk.
  • If potential employers are short of time to appoint someone to a position it is well worth considering to not hold a 90 Day Trial Period – the other obligations listed above will however, still apply regardless.

Ensure you get it right when starting people on a 90 Day Trial Period


Three importany payroll changes

Is your business ready for the three important payroll changes? These three changes will take effect from the 1st April 2012. The changes affect every employer and employee in New Zealand.

1. Kiwisaver changes:

Currently all employer kiwisaver contributions up to 2% are exempt frpm Employer Superannuation Contribution Tax (ESCT). Any contributions above 2% are subject to tax. From 1st April 2012 the exemption will be removed all employer contribution will be taxed.

2. ACC Levy - Rate Reduction:

The current ACC levies for 2011/2012 year is $2.04 per $100 of earnings. The levy amount for the 2012/2013 year will be reduced to $1.70 per $100 of earnings. Remember to update your payroll or your employees will be overtaxed!

3. Student Loans:

All student loan borrowers from 1st April 2012 will be required to use the student loan (SL) Tax Code regardless of earnings unless they have an exemption of use a CAE, EDW or WT Tax Code. Previously you only needed to use the SL Tax Code if your earnings were above the repayment threshold. The student loan repayment threshold is $347 per week.

**MYOB Payroll 2012 will automate the changes.


2012/2013 Child Support Rates

As of 1st April 2012 Inland Revenue have recalculated the rates that are used to assess child support payments.

The minimum annual assessment income for Child Support is $863, even if your actual assessable income in less than $863.

Annual assessable income for Child Support is capped at $126,577.

Annual Taxable Income – Living Allowances = Annual Assessable Income

New Living Allowance Rates
Single and no children living with you $14,679
Married, civil union or de facto and no children living with you $19,969
Married, civil union or de facto and one child living with you $28,240
Married, civil union or de facto and two children living with you $31,222
Married, civil union or de facto and three children living with you $34,205
Married, civil union or de facto and four or more children living with you $37,187

If you pay Child Support for Percentage if care not shared Percentage if you share care*
One Child 18% 12%
Two Children 24% 18%
Three Children 27% 21%
Four Children 30% 24%
Five Children 30% 25.5%
Six Children 30% 27%
Seven Children 30% 28.5%
Eight or more Children 30% 30%

* Shared care for child support means you have care of the child for at least 40% (146 nights) of the child support year.


Holiday Pay and Parental Leave

An employee's annual leave entitlement accrues while they are away on parental leave as the leave is considered to be part of the employee's continuous service. However, a little known fact amongst employers is that the method of calculating holiday pay for employees who have returned from parental leave is different to the normal holiday pay calculation.

Holiday pay is normally calculated as the higher of wither the average weekly earnings for the last 12 months immediately before the end of the last pay period before the holiday is taken, or the employee's ordinary weekly pay at the beginning of the holiday. However the calculation changes when the employee takes holidays in the 12 months following parental leave.

The calculation for holidays taken within 12 months of return from parental leave is based on the average weekly earnings for the 12 months immediately before the end of the last pay period before the holiday, and is not compared to the ordinary weekly pay. This means that it is very likely that the amount of holiday pay maybe less then the employee is expecting.

It is important that both employers and employees are aware of the difference in calculation methods before annual leave is taken.

If you have any questions about the above or for more information please contact us.


Depreciation

IRD has issued new depreciation rates for residential rental property chattels effective from 1 april 2011. For more information contact us.

Buildings can no longer be depreciated effective 1 April 2011. Carparks (buildings and pads) can still be depreciated.


Tax Avoidance

IRD has a new weapon - what did Parliament contemplate! Given that Inland Revenue writes the law and advises Parliament and MP's don't have a clue - arguably Parliament contemplated what ever Inland Revenue contemplated. So logically, if Inland Revenue doesn't like what a taxpayer does with the law it recommends to Parliament and writes - it will yell TAX AVOIDANCE! Unfortunately - if it yells - the Courts will generally agree.

This was the basis of the decision in Penny & Hooper where the Supreme Court confirmed that schemes and arrangements entered into with the purpose of avoiding tax although structurally correct are still caught by the anti avoidance provisions of the Income Tax Act.


Gift Duty

Gift Duty has been abolished - What are the implications? - For more information contact us.


Family Tax Credit

Family Tax credits for children aged under 16 increases from 1 April 2012 - For more information contact us.


Inland Revenue is a Creditor

The Income Tax Act 2007 has a provision which allows Inland Revenue to collect outstanding tax of a company from another similar company if it considers there was an arrangement to avoid paying tax due.

The company can have similar shareholders or directors and the rule applies to most taxes.

The message is clear, know the law - there are trips and traps for advisers and their clients.

Government are enforcing the law with increased effect. It cannot be assumed that there will be no consequences for actions.


"Phoenix" Companies

There is a provision in the Companies Act which provides that it is an offence for a director of a company liquidated because it was unable to pay its debts to be a director of a new company that carries on business and has the same or similar name to the failed company.

The penalty that can be imposed on a such a director is up to 5 years imprisonment or a fine of up to $200,000.


For more information contact us.